<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Tamron 70-300 Di LD Macro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fotoblography.com/2008/04/20/review-of-tamron-70-300-di-ld-macro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fotoblography.com/2008/04/20/review-of-tamron-70-300-di-ld-macro/</link>
	<description>Life in and out of focus.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Kanarek</title>
		<link>http://www.fotoblography.com/2008/04/20/review-of-tamron-70-300-di-ld-macro/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Kanarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotoblography.com/?p=117#comment-688</guid>
		<description>I own the Tamron Di 70-300 as my "Don't want to damage my good stuff" lens...Kind of my "Schlep" around lens.  Very good from 70 to 180 mm.  CA is pretty radical though.  I once owned the Sigma of the same ilk, but it could never focus properly.  The Tamron is excellent within the above focal range.  If it weren't for the CA I would give it 5 stars.  None the less incredible value for the money.

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the Tamron Di 70-300 as my &#8220;Don&#8217;t want to damage my good stuff&#8221; lens&#8230;Kind of my &#8220;Schlep&#8221; around lens.  Very good from 70 to 180 mm.  CA is pretty radical though.  I once owned the Sigma of the same ilk, but it could never focus properly.  The Tamron is excellent within the above focal range.  If it weren&#8217;t for the CA I would give it 5 stars.  None the less incredible value for the money.</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FotoBlography.com &#187; Flight of the Bumblebee</title>
		<link>http://www.fotoblography.com/2008/04/20/review-of-tamron-70-300-di-ld-macro/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>FotoBlography.com &#187; Flight of the Bumblebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotoblography.com/?p=117#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] was shooting photos around the house the other day and was zoomed way in on this flower with my new Tamron 70-300 lens when I saw a bee starting to buzz around it. I quickly aimed the camera to the flower he was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was shooting photos around the house the other day and was zoomed way in on this flower with my new Tamron 70-300 lens when I saw a bee starting to buzz around it. I quickly aimed the camera to the flower he was [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.fotoblography.com/2008/04/20/review-of-tamron-70-300-di-ld-macro/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotoblography.com/?p=117#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Good review of a good lens.

Interesting that you get 90% success with PSP X2.  I get around 50% success with the automatic one-button purple frining fix in PSP X.  But a global color conversion of purple to dark grey, using the HSL/color saturation tool, consistently does the job.

I use the 70-300 pretty regularly with the Tamron 1.4x TC and get generally good results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review of a good lens.</p>
<p>Interesting that you get 90% success with PSP X2.  I get around 50% success with the automatic one-button purple frining fix in PSP X.  But a global color conversion of purple to dark grey, using the HSL/color saturation tool, consistently does the job.</p>
<p>I use the 70-300 pretty regularly with the Tamron 1.4x TC and get generally good results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.fotoblography.com/2008/04/20/review-of-tamron-70-300-di-ld-macro/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotoblography.com/?p=117#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment on my review and for your thoughts  on the lens.  I am definitely going to check out your gallery of photos with the Tamron!  I also have the Tamron 1.4 TC.  I have not tried it yet with the Tamron 70-300 but after reading your comment I cant wait to give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment on my review and for your thoughts  on the lens.  I am definitely going to check out your gallery of photos with the Tamron!  I also have the Tamron 1.4 TC.  I have not tried it yet with the Tamron 70-300 but after reading your comment I cant wait to give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaRee</title>
		<link>http://www.fotoblography.com/2008/04/20/review-of-tamron-70-300-di-ld-macro/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>LaRee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotoblography.com/?p=117#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I agree with your assessment of the Tamron 70-300 Di LD. I am consistently impressed by mine. I hope you continue to enjoy yours too. I have a gallery I put up when I first got the lens last year. I did a walk in the canyon and fell in love with this lens. I must say that it really does rival the Sigma 50-500 I own, although the Tamron doesn't have the reach, it is sharp all the way to 300mm and performs well with a tamron 1.4 tc too.
Here is the link to my gallery of Tamron 70-300 images if you are interested.
http://LaRee.smugmug.com/gallery/3092531_VkMin/1/169818240_3M4gM
I've taken thousands of photos with this lens since I've owned it. I'd say it is my most used lens even though I have many very fine lenses to choose from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assessment of the Tamron 70-300 Di LD. I am consistently impressed by mine. I hope you continue to enjoy yours too. I have a gallery I put up when I first got the lens last year. I did a walk in the canyon and fell in love with this lens. I must say that it really does rival the Sigma 50-500 I own, although the Tamron doesn&#8217;t have the reach, it is sharp all the way to 300mm and performs well with a tamron 1.4 tc too.<br />
Here is the link to my gallery of Tamron 70-300 images if you are interested.<br />
<a href="http://LaRee.smugmug.com/gallery/3092531_VkMin/1/169818240_3M4gM" rel="nofollow">http://LaRee.smugmug.com/gallery/3092531_VkMin/1/169818240_3M4gM</a><br />
I&#8217;ve taken thousands of photos with this lens since I&#8217;ve owned it. I&#8217;d say it is my most used lens even though I have many very fine lenses to choose from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
